Have to give commentor Pat credit - he predicted the spin. My collaborator here at MissingAbducted is another genius, and spiffy props to him for his deductive reasoning. It's really freakin' scary how you both predicted this.
Bounty Hunter Leonard Padilla has been on every show he can be on all night including Greta. In each of these shows, what could be the "new" defense story had started to blossom via Leonard's casual remarks. The following assumes you know several things about this case thus far before reading further:
- Who Casey called that wasn't a family member on June 16th (3 friends)
- Where some of those people may have been or are at the present time (Georgia and Puerto Rico)
- Which of these people are or were former law enforcement
In nearly every interview Leonard Padilla gave this evening, those pieces of information relate directly to the statements he made about what he believed may have happened and why he thinks Caylee is alive. As Casey's attorney Jose Baez said last night on Greta, the explanation of why Casey did not report Caylee missing for 31 days "would be covered in his opening statement" -- we think Leonard gave mondo hints about what that statement might contain tonight. For example:
- Leonard said that he believed Casey gave her to a "friend" (who isn't the Gonzalez chick Casey named long ago) for a couple of days who didn't bring her back
- He alluded to "Georgia" and "Puerto Rico" as where folks could be who have or have had Caylee
- Jose's co-council Mike Walsh said in an MSNBC interview a couple weeks ago that one of Casey's closest friends "had mental issues"
- Casey doesn't trust law enforcement
The allusion here is that one of the 3 friends would still have Caylee. (In weaving this tale, all defense parties involved would have to completely discount the car and it's contents - which we believe they have done for a while). In a murder or manslaughter defense to cast reasonable doubt, those friends would need to have an alibi for some period of time on June 16th when Caylee went missing. God forbid any of those people babysat Caylee on that day, or even just saw Casey and Caylee together that afternoon of June 16. Start thinking about it, folks. We can see this one coming, and why shouldn't we? Casey's been in jail for a month and had lots of time to create a new drama. This time though, it's going to affect people around her who DO know her.
About the bond thing...the snag may be the FL bond agents who are complaining want Padilla to follow the rules they have to follow in posting bond (especially from one out of state), and not get an "exception" made for the way *he* wants to do things. The Padillas have to work with a local FL licensed bondsman, the name of whom is in the WFTV report linked in prior post. It's the Florida Department of Insurers that has to clear Padillas' company to do interstate business, because from what he can infer from Padilla, some other bond agents are complaining. He calls this competition, but we think it's more like "follow our FL rules, Amcehead Bounty Hunter." Thus, we have what we think is the following going on when the Padillas are referring to "red tape":
1) Tony Padilla's company is registered California bond company with Texas based bond insurer
2) Leonard has 50K, wants to give it to his nephew Tony Padilla thru the California company to have the Texas insurer secure the bond
3) Tony has to have a licensed Florida bondsman to post the bond - he's not registered to do so in Florida
4) The Florida bondsman, in effect, is the one posting the bond for with Tony's company with the Texas insurer
5) The Florida bondsman's own insurer is now involved in the mix here and that wasn't planned for
6) We think the Florida bondsman's insurer wants to be assured that their client (the Florida bondsman) won't be held responsible for the bond -- and that assurance may also be the reasoning behind the Padillas allegedly petitioning the judge for GPS ankle bracelet rather than an electronic proximity monitor for Casey
7) Other Florida bond agents are crying foul with either the way the bond is being insured, or the fact that an out of state bonsdman is collecting the $50K
None of this debacle has anything to do with whether anyone wants Casey to have bond or not: it's more about following the "rules" and not making "exceptions", which may be why Leonard mentioned the FL Department of Insurers has to make a decision.
The thing we find compelling is Leonard also said on Nancy Grace that interstate commerce for the Texas insurer to secure the bond is being interfered with. WE think what's being interpreted by other bond agents in Florida controversially is who gets the $50 K downpayment towards the bond. It appears that the correct procedural way in Florida this is to be done is by giving the Florida bondsman additional $50K (for his insurer, who has some rights here because the Florida bondsman is the one who will be filing the bond), which makes Leonard put out $50K ($100k total) to 2 companies, rather than just $50K.
It really is all about who is bonding and who is insuring and who is permitted to do so and what way under FL statutes. And yeah, about money too.